PTOtherJournal of physical therapy science2017

Analysis of the muscular activities of the tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius muscles in functional reach.

Se-Won Yoon

PMID 28603358

WHAT IT FOUND

In 48 adults aged 60 or older, shin and calf muscle activity increased as they reached farther during the functional reach test.

Standing on a cushioned mat did not change that pattern compared with a firm surface.

Key findings

01The tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius each showed a significant main effect of reach section, but neither showed a significant main effect of ground or a significant ground-by-section interaction.

02The table reports root mean square EMG values for stable ground: tibialis anterior 0.002 ± 0.001 at 0 cm and 0.006 ± 0.004 at 25 cm; gastrocnemius 0.004 ± 0.002 at 0 cm and 0.017 ± 0.021 at 25 cm.

03The study included 48 elderly persons aged 60 or older, and it targeted those with good balance who could reach more than 25 cm, not those with disability or reduced balance.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The participants had good balance and could reach more than 25 cm, so the results may not apply to older adults with disability or reduced balance. Trunk rotation was not controlled, and the authors note that trunk rotation can increase functional reach, so the muscle activity may not isolate lower-limb strategy. The authors report that the data were not normally distributed and say different results might be obtained if normality assumptions were met. The study measured muscle electrical activity during testing, not falls or treatment outcomes.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that unstable-surface training changes lower-leg muscle activity in older adults. The study found no significant difference between stable and unstable ground, and it was not a treatment trial.

Read it on PubMed →