RNSystematic ReviewNursing open2023

An integrative review of defining characteristic of the nursing diagnosis "spiritual distress".

Fateme Eshghi, Lida Nikfarid, Armin Zareiyan

PMID 36627735

WHAT IT FOUND

Across 21 reviewed studies, lack of calm, hope, changes in anger behaviour, meaning in life, changes in fear and crying behaviour, and disorder in values were the most frequent features of spiritual distress.

These are assessment cues, not tested treatments.

Key findings

01The criteria reported most often were lack of calm, hope, changes in anger behaviour, meaning in life, changes in fear and crying behaviour, and disorder in values and beliefs.

02The review extracted 74 criteria that could describe defining characteristics of spiritual distress, but only 33 were already listed by NANDA-I.

03Most codes concerned spiritual suffering connected to self, with 46 codes, compared with 14 for God, 8 for others and 6 for nature.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is a review of 21 articles, not a study of patients, and it does not test whether any characteristic accurately diagnoses spiritual distress or improves care. The included studies had many different designs, so the researchers could not use a standard quality score and did not exclude articles based on rigour and relevance ratings. Most included studies were in cancer patients, so the findings may not apply to other populations. The search was limited to English and Persian articles published between January 2010 and December 2020. MESH did not include spiritual distress. The authors note that the categorisation used was removed in NANDA-I 2021-2023, and that some characteristics overlap with anxiety and frustration. The review proposes 41 additional criteria, but these were not clinically validated in this paper.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The study was supported by Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, and the funder had no role in design, writing, data collection or analysis.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat the 74 criteria as a validated diagnostic checklist. The review synthesised 21 articles with different designs and did not test whether these features accurately distinguish spiritual distress from anxiety, frustration or other diagnoses, or whether acting on them improves patient outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →