RNRCTOncology nursing forum2022

An Ecologic Model for Identifying Coping Resources to Manage Psychological Distress Among Spanish-Speaking Latina Women Newly Diagnosed With Breast Cancer.

Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson, Anita L Stewart, Carmen Ortíz and 1 others

PMID 36067240

WHAT IT FOUND

Newly diagnosed Spanish-speaking Latina women had less health distress when confident managing breast cancer treatment, confident in coping, and feeling neighborhood cohesion.

Among coping resources, anxiety was lower only with confidence managing treatment. Support-service engagement was not associated with distress or anxiety.

Key findings

01Greater confidence managing breast cancer treatment and greater coping confidence were associated with less health distress.

02Perceived neighborhood cohesion was associated with less health distress.

03Confidence managing breast cancer treatment was associated with less anxiety, while organization/community level resources, including support-service engagement, were not associated with health distress or anxiety.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was not representative of all Latina women with breast cancer because it was mainly Spanish-speaking Mexican immigrants. The data are cross-sectional, so the associations cannot show that coping resources reduce distress. The ecological framework was applied after the parent study was designed, and not all levels or variables from the original framework were measured.

Declared interests

The supplied publication types list NIH intramural and non-U.S. government research support. No explicit author conflict-of-interest declaration is included in the supplied text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that improving confidence, coping, or neighborhood cohesion will reduce distress. This is a cross-sectional analysis, so causality cannot be determined.

Read it on PubMed →