Agenda for Sleep Research in Older Adults With Cancer: A Conference Report.
Ellyn E Matthews, Eileen Danaher Hacker, Julie L Otte and 1 others
PMID 28045699WHAT IT FOUND
Sleep research in older adults with cancer lacks consistent definitions, standard measures, and a unifying model.
Hospital sleep screening, pain control, and environment remain research priorities, not proven interventions.
Key findings
01The conference report identifies three conceptual gaps: inconsistent sleep terminology, unclear relationships among sleep variables, and no comprehensive sleep model.
02Sleep measurement is not standardized; researchers have used questionnaires, diaries, polysomnography, and wrist actigraphy.
03Presenters reported that 2 out of every 5 general medical inpatients in an academic medical center were at high risk for obstructive sleep apnea, and that hospitalized patients slept 2 hours per night less than at home.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The paper is a conference report, not a patient study, so it cannot show that any sleep intervention works. It reviewed 23 conference slides and used expert consensus, not a systematic search or pre-specified methods. Some hospital numbers were reported by presenters and were not collected by the authors. The hospital sleep apnea example was in general medical inpatients in an academic medical center, not specifically older adults with cancer.
Declared interests
The conference was co-sponsored by the National Institute on Aging and the American Geriatrics Society, with additional unrestricted educational grants from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Pfizer, and Philips-Respironics. Dr. Otte received a travel stipend from Indiana University; other authors reported no funding or conflicts.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the hospital sleep numbers or screening suggestion as evidence that changing care improves outcomes. The paper reports conference presentations and research gaps, not tested interventions or patient outcomes.