RNRCTCancer nursing2019

Adherence to American Cancer Society Guidelines on Nutrition and Physical Activity in Female Cancer Survivors: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial (Yale Fitness Intervention Trial).

So-Hyun Park, M Tish Knobf, Jane Kerstetter and 1 others

PMID 29746264

WHAT IT FOUND

Female cancer survivors had modest guideline adherence.

Supervised exercise increased physical activity versus control group calls, but did not improve diet or BMI. Overall adherence stayed modest and was similar at 12 months.

Key findings

01Total MET-minutes/week increased in the exercise group and decreased in the control group, and the between-group difference was significant at 6 and 12 months.

02BMI and fruit and vegetable intake did not differ between groups over 12 months.

03Mean total adherence score was 4.2 of 8 at baseline, 4.9 at 6 months and 4.8 at 12 months, and both groups had the same average score at 12 months.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was 154 mostly white, highly educated, employed women in Connecticut, so results may not apply to more diverse female cancer survivors. The exercise group was younger than the control group (50.6 vs 53.1 years). Attrition was 11.6%, though it did not differ between groups. Diet was self-reported with 4-day records, which may have been burdensome, could have changed what participants ate, and may have been affected by social desirability.

Declared interests

The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that supervised exercise improves diet or weight. It increased physical activity, but BMI, fruit and vegetable intake, fiber and red meat intake did not differ between groups over 12 months, and total adherence was similar at 12 months.

Read it on PubMed →