Adherence to a reproductive health intervention for young adults with sickle cell.
Nyema T Eades-Brown, Anne O Oguntoye, Dalal Aldossary and 7 others
PMID 38408228WHAT IT FOUND
In-person follow-up retained more adults with sickle cell disease or trait than remote online follow-up.
The CHOICES intervention group did not attend more visits than the control e-book group.
Key findings
01Participants in the face-to-face study attended more post-baseline visits on average than participants in the online study (3.0 vs 3.4 visits, p = .002).
02At 6 months, 76% of online participants attended the data collection visit versus 83% of face-to-face participants.
03The CHOICES intervention group did not attend more visits than the control e-book group in either delivery format.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The comparison was between two existing datasets that used different recruitment and follow-up methods, so differences in adherence could reflect those study differences rather than delivery format alone. The two studies differed in participant characteristics, including gender, race, education, and employment, which may have affected follow-up attendance. The sample was mostly non-Hispanic Black or African American women, so the results may not apply equally to men or other racial and ethnic groups. The online study required internet and social media access, so it excluded people without that access. The outcome was attendance at study visits, not knowledge gained, reproductive decisions, or health outcomes. The online study had a final attrition rate of 16% and the face-to-face study 15%, so some participants were lost before the end.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that online reproductive health education is ineffective or that in-person education improves patient outcomes. The study measured attendance at follow-up visits, not the effect of the CHOICES education, and the CHOICES group did not attend more visits than the control e-book group.