A Telehealth Physical Therapy Intervention to Increase Physical Activity in Adults With Knee OA: The Delaware PEAK Randomized Controlled Trial.
Daniel K White, Rana S Hinman, Sydney Liles and 6 others
PMID 40258072WHAT IT FOUND
The primary outcome was null.
Five telehealth PT consultations over 12 weeks did not increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in adults with knee OA compared to a website control. The between-group difference was −1.8 minutes per day.
Key findings
01The intervention was not superior to the control for change in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity over 12 weeks. The between-group difference was −1.8 minutes per day (95% CI: −7.0 to 3.3).
02Negative treatment beliefs about physical therapy and exercise decreased more in the intervention group than the control. From baseline to 12 weeks, the change was −1.6 (95% CI: −2.8 to −0.4) for PT beliefs and −1.7 (95% CI: −3.0 to −0.5) for exercise beliefs.
03The intervention group showed greater improvements in pain (VAS and KOOS), quality of life, and activities of daily living from baseline to 12 and 24 weeks compared to the control.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Single site, single treating PT, so results reflect one clinician's delivery style and one practice setting. Neither participants nor the PT were blinded to group assignment. 15 of 103 randomized participants were excluded from the primary analysis for lacking valid baseline monitor data, leaving 88 in the modified ITT sample. Only 67 participants had valid monitor data at 12 weeks, below the 84 the study was powered for. The sample was 82.5% female, 84.5% White, and 80% college-educated, with few males (17.5%), Black (7.8%), or Hispanic (2.9%) participants. Online recruitment via Facebook may have missed older adults and those with lower household income. Fixed block size of 4 makes the randomization sequence more predictable than variable block sizes. The intervention included step goals, strength training, and education together, so the contribution of any single component to the (null) activity outcome cannot be separated. The authors note a mismatch between the step-count goal and the MVPA primary outcome, since each step counted equally regardless of intensity.
Declared interests
Funded by the NIH (extramural) and a non-U.S. government source, as listed in the publication types. No specific industry sponsor or author conflict of interest is stated in the provided text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the per-protocol finding of 849 more steps per day at 24 weeks as proof the programme increases physical activity. The primary outcome was null, the per-protocol sample (n = 71) is a post-hoc subset of the full randomized group, and the exploratory pain and function gains were not the study's primary question.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →