A Standard Push-Pull Protocol for Waste-Free Sampling in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
Clare McBride, Suzan Miller-Hoover, James A Proudfoot
PMID 29659467WHAT IT FOUND
In pediatric intensive care and cardiac unit patients, a 4 mL push-pull central venous catheter sampling method produced lab values comparable to standard draws and had no catheter-related infections in 7-day follow-up.
Nurses could consider it for routine CVC sampling.
Key findings
01In 37 patients and 88 draws, push-pull samples and standard samples showed no significant differences in mean laboratory values.
02A glucose difference was statistically significant but not clinically significant: push-pull values averaged 7.5 points lower than standard values.
03During 7-day follow-up after push-pull draws, no catheter-related infections were identified and 8 withdrawal occlusions occurred, 6 in PICCs.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The project was a small, single-site convenience sample of 37 patients and 88 draws, so it cannot prove the method is safe for all pediatric central lines. Push-pull and standard samples were not drawn at the same time; comparisons were usually within 12 to 24 hours, during which critically ill patients can change. Laboratory values were compared with standard central line draws, not peripheral venipuncture, so the method was not tested against the gold standard. Catheter complications could not be separated from standard sampling because both methods were used on the same patients and catheters. Some tests had too few samples for statistical analysis, and several samples were excluded for errors or contamination. Blood return from 2.6 Fr PICCs was sometimes difficult and prevented one push-pull draw, so very small catheters may not be suitable. Coagulation tests were drawn from heparinized catheters, which remains controversial and was compared only to standard CVC draws.
Declared interests
The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The project was exempt from Institutional Review Board oversight.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as proof that push-pull sampling prevents catheter occlusion or infection for all pediatric central lines. It was a small single-site evidence-based practice project, both push-pull and standard sampling were used, and 8 withdrawal occlusions occurred within 7 days.