A Review of the State of the Science of HIV and Stigma: Context, Conceptualization, Measurement, Interventions, Gaps, and Future Priorities.
Michael V Relf, William L Holzemer, Lauren Holt and 2 others
PMID 33654005WHAT IT FOUND
Stigma remains a barrier to HIV care, but most interventions studied so far are low quality and fail to improve long-term health outcomes like medication adherence.
Multilevel approaches that combine individual support with structural changes appear most promising.
Key findings
01Most HIV stigma reduction interventions reviewed were of low methodological quality, and very few examined their impact on actual HIV-related outcomes such as medication adherence or engagement in care.
02Interventions targeting multiple levels (individual and structural) and those delivered by health care providers or in community settings with two or more sessions showed greater effectiveness in reducing stigma.
03There is a significant lack of validated instruments to measure intersectional stigma, which is the convergence of multiple stigmatized statuses such as race, gender, and HIV status.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This is a narrative review, not a systematic review, so it does not follow a strict protocol for study selection or quality appraisal of the included reviews. The evidence base for the interventions themselves is described as largely low quality, with poor randomization and varied measurement tools. Few studies reported on distal health outcomes, limiting the ability to conclude that stigma reduction directly improves physical health or viral suppression.
Declared interests
The authors report no real or perceived vested interests related to this article. The article was supported by NIH funding.
The easy way to misread this
Do not assume that reducing HIV stigma automatically leads to better health outcomes like viral suppression. The review states that very few studies examined this link, and most interventions had small effects on attitudes rather than proven clinical benefits.