A Rapid Review and Narrative Synthesis of the Consequences of Non-Inclusive Sex Education in UK Schools on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Questioning Young People.
Beth Epps, Marianne Markowski, Karen Cleaver
PMID 34605714WHAT IT FOUND
LGBTQ young people said school sex education assumed heterosexual sex, leaving them unsure how to stay safe or recognise abuse.
They often learned from online sources, including pornography, which lacked safer sex information. Nurses should ask what they learned.
Key findings
01LGBTQ young people reported that heterocentric sex education left them unsure how to identify as a sexual minority and begin healthy relationships, and feeling shame, isolation, depression and suicidal thoughts.
02In one included study, a quarter of participants had experienced domestic abuse, and all said education on same-sex domestic abuse was non-existent.
03Participants in four studies said they used the internet, social media, charity websites and pornography to learn about same-sex relationships; pornography had little evidence of contraception.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
It is a rapid review, not a full systematic review: the search was limited to English peer-reviewed articles from 2010 onward, and grey literature and conference papers were excluded. Only 9 studies, with 1,085 young adult participants, were included; most were qualitative and had small samples, so the themes are informative but not generalisable. Most included studies were outside the UK: five in North America, one in Australia, one in Ireland, one in the Netherlands and one in the UK, so UK school nurses must judge transferability. The review does not test an intervention; it reports experiences and associations, so it cannot prove that changing sex education will improve mental or sexual health. Study quality was good to medium, with several included studies unclear about researcher-participant relationships, recruitment, exposure measurement or follow-up. Participants were mainly young adults recalling school, and some surveys did not capture all sexual or gender minority identities.
Declared interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest and received no financial support.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that inclusive sex education has been shown to prevent poor mental health or unsafe sex. Most included studies only described young people's experiences, and the survey evidence measured perceived inclusivity and symptoms at one time, so it cannot show that the education itself caused the outcomes.