RNSystematic ReviewWomen and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives2020

A qualitative meta-synthesis of women's experiences of labor dystocia.

Katherine Kissler, Jacqueline Jones, A Kristienne McFarland and 1 others

PMID 31422024

WHAT IT FOUND

Women described prolonged labor as a shift from expecting natural birth to medical delivery.

They linked distress to loss of choice and feeling excluded from decisions, and coping to feeling safe, supported, and included.

Key findings

01Women described prolonged labor as a transition from expected natural birth to medical delivery, often complicated by moving from midwifery to obstetric care and deviating from their birth plan.

02Loss of choice was central, with decisions driven by clinical necessity and some women feeling excluded from decision-making or dissatisfied with care.

03Women reported more positive emotions when decision-making was shared, and dissatisfaction when they felt excluded from decisions or had negative interactions with providers.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is a synthesis of qualitative experiences, not a trial or outcome study, so it cannot show that any care approach improves birth or reduces cesarean birth. The included studies were English-language qualitative studies from developed countries and excluded provider or support-person experiences, so the findings may not transfer to other settings or to staff perspectives. Most included studies assumed oxytocin augmentation was necessary for prolonged labor, so experiences of prolonged labor without augmentation, or outside a medicalized care environment, were underexplored. Minority women of lower socio-economic and educational backgrounds were underrepresented, and the authors note deficiencies in some included studies. The synthesis reports themes and meanings, not how common any experience was among all women with prolonged labor.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that shared decision-making or accompaniment prevents trauma or improves birth outcomes. This is a qualitative synthesis of women's experiences, not a test of interventions.

Read it on PubMed →