ProtocolFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2022

A protocol to evaluate the impact of embedding Public and Patient Involvement in a structured PhD program for stroke care.

Frances Horgan, Olive Lennon, Anne Hickey, Jan Sorensen, Thilo Kroll, Deirdre McCartan, Patricia Hall, Geraldine O'Callaghan, Clare Fitzgerald, Julianne Hickey, Martin Fahy, Philip Osborne, Mary Scullion, Clíodhna Ní Bhroin, David J Williams

PMID 36189025

WHAT IT FOUND

No results are reported.

The paper describes planned interviews with stroke PhD students, supervisors, patient partners, and managers about public and patient involvement.

What this paper is

This is a study protocol for a planned qualitative evaluation of public and patient involvement in a stroke PhD program. It describes who will be interviewed, when, and how themes will be analysed, but it reports no participant responses, outcomes, or results, so there is nothing here to change your practice.

Declared interests

The study was supported by a Health Research Board of Ireland Collaborative Doctoral Award. The authors declared no commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat this as evidence that public and patient involvement improved stroke care or that it is feasible. No results are reported.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
Potential sample n = 34
Certainty of evidence
Very low

Browse

    Cite

    Frances Horgan, Olive Lennon, Anne Hickey, et al. A protocol to evaluate the impact of embedding Public and Patient Involvement in a structured PhD program for stroke care. Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences. 2022.

    Read the original