A preliminary examination of brain morphometry in youth with Down syndrome with and without parent-reported sleep difficulties.
Nancy Raitano Lee, Megan Perez, Taralee Hamner and 2 others
PMID 32106035WHAT IT FOUND
Seventeen youth with Down syndrome and parent-reported sleep difficulties had smaller total brain volume and frontal, temporal, and parietal lobe volumes than nine peers with Down syndrome without sleep difficulties.
This small imaging study cannot show sleep caused the differences.
Key findings
01Youth with Down syndrome and parent-reported sleep difficulties (n = 17) had smaller total brain volume and frontal, temporal, and parietal lobe volumes than youth with Down syndrome without sleep difficulties (n = 9).
02After accounting for multiple comparisons, the sleep-difficulty group showed differences from the Down syndrome-only group in 7 of 34 cortical subregions, including superior frontal, lateral orbitofrontal, superior and inferior parietal, precuneus, middle temporal, and fusiform gyri.
03When total brain volume was controlled, structures that were smaller in the Down syndrome groups did not generally survive correction.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they found
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study included only 17 participants with Down syndrome and sleep difficulties and 9 with Down syndrome without sleep difficulties, so it is preliminary and small. Sleep difficulty was defined by one parent question about awakening, restlessness, or snoring, not by objective sleep testing, and the severity of sleep problems was not measured. The design was cross-sectional and retrospective, so it cannot show that sleep difficulties caused smaller brain volumes. The sleep-difficulty group included participants with and without parent-reported sleep apnea, so the findings do not show that sleep apnea alone was involved. Many brain regions were compared, and after total brain volume was controlled, several smaller-volume findings did not remain significant. The sleep-difficulty group had more congenital heart defects, and although the authors ran checks, this comorbidity cannot be fully ruled out as a contributor. Participants ranged from 5 to 25 years old, and the study assumed a similar age-brain volume relationship across groups. The study did not include a typically developing comparison group with sleep difficulties, did not measure brainstem substructures such as the pons, and did not examine effects of sleep treatment.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that poor sleep causes smaller brain volume in Down syndrome. The study compared groups at one time point, used a single parent report question to define sleep difficulty, and cannot separate sleep effects from total brain size or other medical conditions.