A pilot study to determine the feasibility of a cluster randomised controlled trial of an intervention to change peer attitudes towards children who stutter.
Rizwana B Mallick, Lehana Thabane, A S M Borhan and 1 others
PMID 30035603WHAT IT FOUND
The classroom stuttering programme did not show a clear overall change in peer attitudes at 1 or 6 months.
One verbal interaction subscale showed a positive shift at 6 months. The pilot suggests a future trial may be feasible, not proof the programme works.
Key findings
01Eight schools participated, and nine of 11 invited schools agreed, giving a school recruitment rate of 82%.
02The overall attitude score did not show a clear difference between groups at 1 month or 6 months after the intervention.
03At 6 months, the verbal interaction subscale showed a positive difference between groups.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was a pilot feasibility study, not a trial that tested whether the intervention works. Only eight schools were analysed, so the result depends heavily on a small number of clusters. The groups were unbalanced, with 149 children analysed in the intervention group and 252 in the control group. Many children were not analysed: 449 were recruited, but 401 were analysed. Schools reported time pressure and difficulty arranging repeated visits, which affected dropout and feasibility. The CCR was delivered as one package containing a social story, role play and teacher-led discussion, so the contribution of each component cannot be separated. The findings apply only to Western Cape South African schools in Quintiles 2, 3, 4 and 5.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that the classroom stuttering programme changes peer attitudes. The overall attitude measure did not show a clear difference at 1 or 6 months, and only one subscale showed a positive difference at 6 months. The programme was delivered as a package containing a social story, role play and teacher-led discussion, so the contribution of each component cannot be separated.