PTOtherJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2022

A novel push-pull central-lever mechanism reduces peak forces and energy-cost compared to hand-rim wheelchair propulsion during a controlled lab-based experiment.

Thomas A le Rütte, Fransisca Trigo, Luca Bessems and 2 others

PMID 35300710

WHAT IT FOUND

After practice, in 30 able-bodied novices, a push-pull lever lowered peak push and pull forces and energy cost versus hand-rim propulsion, but efficiency, heart rate, and perceived exertion did not differ.

Key findings

01After practice, peak push force with the lever was 42 ± 10 N and peak pull force was 46 ± 10 N, compared with 63 ± 21 N peak push force on the hand-rim.

02Energy expenditure was 263 ± 45 W with the lever and 298 ± 59 W with the hand-rim, but gross mechanical efficiency, heart rate, perceived exertion, and stroke frequency did not differ significantly.

03The active portion of the propulsion cycle was 86 ± 9% for the lever and 31 ± 6% for the hand-rim.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The participants were able-bodied novices with no wheelchair experience, so the findings do not show what manual wheelchair users would experience or tolerate. The study was a short, controlled lab treadmill experiment with fixed speed and power, not real-world wheelchair use, slopes, curbs, or transfers. The tested RoChair prototype was difficult to step into and get out of, so it is not yet ready as an everyday wheelchair for manual wheelchair users. Some outcomes were analysed with fewer participants because of equipment errors, including heart rate in the lever group with n = 12 for both sessions and energy expenditure in the lever group with n = 14 at post. The lever did not significantly differ from the hand-rim for gross mechanical efficiency, heart rate, perceived exertion, or stroke frequency. The study did not report joint loads or muscle activity, so lower peak force does not establish reduced shoulder or upper-limb strain. The study compared novices learning both devices, so it may not reflect experienced hand-rim users' technique or the added skill demands of the lever.

Declared interests

ROTA Mobility funded the work; the supplied text does not provide author conflict disclosures.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat the lower peak forces as evidence that this wheelchair reduces strain or injury risk for manual wheelchair users. The study tested able-bodied novices in a controlled lab, did not report joint loads or muscle activity, and the prototype was not yet easy to transfer into or out of.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
30 able-bodied novices (15 lever, 15 hand-rim); analysed n varied by outcome, e.g., lever heart-rate n = 12 for both sessions and lever energy-expenditure n = 14 at post
Certainty of evidence
Low

More in cardiopulmonary

Browse

Cite

Thomas A le Rütte, Fransisca Trigo, Luca Bessems, et al. A novel push-pull central-lever mechanism reduces peak forces and energy-cost compared to hand-rim wheelchair propulsion during a controlled lab-based experiment. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2022.

Read the original