RNQualitativeInternational journal of nursing sciences2026

A multi-domain qualitative study on factors influencing access to preventive hepatitis B care among rural population.

Caixia Li, Mi Zhong, Gengyang Yuan and 5 others

PMID 42521397

WHAT IT FOUND

Rural Chinese adults and migrant workers described waiting until severely ill, avoiding screening because of cost and stigma, and leaving families unvaccinated.

These barriers delayed hepatitis B diagnosis and treatment.

Key findings

01Ten participants postponed hepatitis B screening because of cost, and three were diagnosed only after advanced complications such as cirrhosis or bleeding.

02Four participants refused hepatitis B vaccination because they thought the vaccine was more dangerous than the virus.

03Fourteen participants with personal or family hepatitis B history mostly met household risk with passivity, and four used preventive measures such as maternal antiviral prophylaxis or family antibody screening.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study interviewed only rural patients and migrant workers, not healthcare providers or policymakers, so it cannot show how services operate or why recommendations may be missed. Participants were recruited from hospitals and a community centre, so rural people who never attend care may be underrepresented. Eleven of the 45 people approached declined, so the study may miss the views of those who refused. Interviews relied on recall and could be affected by social desirability. The study describes barriers and participants' suggestions; it does not test whether mobile health units, education or insurance changes would improve hepatitis B care. Findings come from Shenzhen and Guizhou, China, and may not apply to other rural populations.

Declared interests

Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The funder had no involvement in study design or conduct, data collection, management, analysis or interpretation, manuscript writing, review or approval, or the decision to submit for publication. Authors declared no conflict of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that mobile health units or tailored education will improve hepatitis B care. The study reports barriers and participants' suggestions, not tested interventions.

Read it on PubMed →