PTOTOtherAmerican journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation2020

A Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of an Exercise Program for Lung Cancer Survivors After Curative-Intent Treatment.

Duc Ha, Jacqueline Kerr, Andrew L Ries and 3 others

PMID 31361623

WHAT IT FOUND

In a simulation, an exercise program cost $79,504 per added year of good health versus usual care.

When patient time and travel were counted, it cost $179,774, above a $100,000 threshold.

Key findings

01The model found the exercise program cost $79,504 per quality-adjusted life-year gained compared with usual care, which was below the $100,000 threshold used for cost-effectiveness.

02When patient time and travel costs were added, the program cost $179,774 per quality-adjusted life-year and was not cost-effective from a societal perspective.

03Removing travel costs to mimic a home-based program still gave $143,556 per quality-adjusted life-year and was not cost-effective from a societal perspective.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study did not enroll lung cancer survivors or test the exercise program. It simulated costs and health outcomes using published data. The exercise program's health benefit and costs were taken from older adults without cancer, so they may not apply to lung cancer survivors. The probability of increasing exercise was taken from breast cancer survivors, not lung cancer survivors. Survival data came from patients who had lung cancer resection surgery, so results may not apply to patients treated with radiation or chemoradiation. The model did not include possible harms of exercise, benefits on aging, chronic disease control, emotional well-being, independence, social function, health care use, or immune checkpoint blockade costs. The authors state there is no definitive randomized trial of this exercise program in stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. Societal costs may be overestimated because exercise can be a leisure activity that does not cause productivity loss.

Declared interests

All authors declared no conflict of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that exercise improves survival or reduces costs in lung cancer survivors. It is a simulation, and the authors state they lack a definitive randomized trial of this exercise program in stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.

Read it on PubMed →