RNNarrative ReviewJournal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association2017

A Critical Review of Instruments Measuring Breastfeeding Attitudes, Knowledge, and Social Support.

Corrine S Casal, Ann Lei, Sera L Young and 1 others

PMID 28135474

WHAT IT FOUND

No single breastfeeding assessment tool is clearly best.

Choose instruments based on your specific goal: the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale for broad use, or the Breastfeeding Attrition Prediction Tool for identifying early weaning risk. Check if the tool fits your culture.

Key findings

01There is no single best instrument for assessing breastfeeding attitudes, knowledge, or social support; selection depends on the specific purpose and target population.

02The Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale has been adapted more than any other tool, but reliability varies and some language may be confusing for certain populations.

03The Breastfeeding Attrition Prediction Tool and its modified version have strong predictive validity for identifying mothers at risk of premature weaning.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is a narrative review, not a systematic review or meta-analysis, so the selection of instruments was subject to author judgment. Many original instrument development papers did not fully report validity or reliability data, limiting the ability to compare them rigorously. The review focuses on instruments measuring attitudes, knowledge, and social support, not on tools measuring actual breastfeeding behavior or clinical outcomes directly.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume that a widely used tool like the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale is automatically valid for your patient population. The review notes that reliability varies across adaptations and that some items may be culturally or linguistically inappropriate, potentially leading to inaccurate assessments of a mother's attitudes or support.

Read it on PubMed →