RNOtherNursing open2022

A comparative study of patient safety in the intensive care units.

Foroozan Atashzadeh-Shoorideh, Azam Shirinabadi Farahani, Amir Hosein Pishgooie and 5 others

PMID 35633148

WHAT IT FOUND

Overall ICU safety scores did not differ between two hospitals, but adult ICUs had lower observed communication scores during patient transfer than paediatric ICUs.

Key findings

01Total mean patient safety scores did not differ significantly between the two university-affiliated hospitals (p = .15).

02Paediatric ICUs had a significantly higher mean score for effective communication during patient transfer than adult ICUs (18.50 ± 2.08 vs 16.13 ± 1.8; p = .04).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study observed nursing practice, not patient outcomes, so it cannot show that any safety dimension caused harm or that fixing it would reduce adverse events. Only two university-affiliated hospitals in Tehran were examined, so findings may not apply to other ICUs. Two fixed observers completed the checklists, and the authors note their presence may have changed nurses' behaviour. The study did not measure nurse experience, workload, staffing, education, reported errors, shift patterns or organisational factors, so differences between units cannot be explained. The checklist was researcher-made, although content validity and inter-rater agreement were reported.

Declared interests

No conflict of interest was declared. The study was funded by Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that adult ICU patients are unsafe or that handover communication caused harm. The study compared observed safety scores, not patient outcomes, and did not test an intervention.

Read it on PubMed →