A bio-ecological model for early screening of developmental coordination disorder.
Xiaotian Dai, Tai Ren, Gareth Williams and 4 others
PMID 41041921WHAT IT FOUND
A model using birth, family and health-record data could flag preschool children at higher DCD risk, but its performance was only moderate and weaker at ages 6 to 10.
It is a triage aid, not a diagnosis.
Key findings
01The model was developed in 150 948 children aged 3 to 5 years and externally validated in 1359 children, including 585 aged 3 to 5 years and 774 aged 6 to 10 years.
02In external validation, the model flagged 71.43% of children with DCD and correctly classified 78.00% of children without DCD for ages 3 to 5, but flagged 54.88% and correctly classified 62.28% for ages 6 to 10.
03Underweight, single-parent family and low birthweight showed strong positive predictive relationships with high risk of DCD.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they found
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The model was developed and tested only in Chinese samples, so it may not work the same in other populations or health systems. Possible DCD was defined by a parent questionnaire in the development sample, while the validation samples used clinical diagnosis, so the outcome was not measured the same way throughout. The model's discrimination was modest, especially in children aged 6 to 10 years, where the reported discrimination value was 0.58, sensitivity was 54.88% and specificity was 62.28%. The study did not test whether using the model in health records improves referral, diagnosis or child outcomes. The model does not distinguish DCD from autism spectrum disorder or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and undetected comorbidities cannot be fully ruled out. Genetic predisposition, detailed environmental quality and early developmental milestones were not available as predictors.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as a diagnostic test for DCD. The paper states the model is only a pre-screening tool to flag children for further assessment, and it does not replace professional diagnosis or structured motor assessment.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →