PTCohortCardiopulmonary physical therapy journal2019

A 1-Month Physical Therapy-Based Outpatient Program for Adults Awaiting Lung Transplantation: A Retrospective Analysis of Exercise Capacity, Symptoms, and Quality of Life.

Rebecca Byrd, Patrick Smith, Omar Mohamedaly and 2 others

PMID 30983916

WHAT IT FOUND

Lung transplant candidates who completed a short outpatient program combining multi-domain exercise, education, and oxygen titration improved walking distance by 69 meters.

Shortness of breath did not show clear improvement.

Key findings

01Walking distance improved by an average of 69 meters after the outpatient program.

02Depression and quality of life scores improved by 1.7 and 1.0 points.

03Participants starting at 305 meters or less had the largest walking gain, 141 meters.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study had no comparison group because all candidates at the center were required to attend rehabilitation. It included only people who met listing criteria, completed the program, and received a transplant, so it may not apply to less stable patients. The treating physical therapist gave the walking test, and participants had only one trial at each time point, so learning or expectation could affect the gain. Oxygen use could differ between tests, and the oval track makes comparison with hallway tests difficult. The program required frequent sessions and high oxygen delivery capacity, so other centers may not replicate it. The paper did not report post-transplant survival or healthcare use.

Declared interests

The authors reported no relevant financial relationships with industry to disclose.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that exercise alone caused the improvements. Participants also received education and oxygen titration, and the study had no control group.

Read it on PubMed →